He doesn’t know what he is talking about. I can see why nobody wants to listen to him. I don’t need to go much further than that. If his “fat table time stamp” is accurate (FAT has a data storage limit and he didn’t say what the size of each download was or if it was FAT16 or 32)… then a much easier explanation is that it was Guccifers downloading off his device that caused the “rounding up”. See my above criticism? He did not rule out Guccifer downloading the information to his device and storing that information on a thumb drive for safe keeping. How can this be proof of anything 2 or 3 times removed from the source.Īlso, let’s assume he is correct about the time stamps and they had to be downloaded locally. ![]() He doesn’t have the original data that the FBI has. What this “NSA Whistleblower” failed to account for in his “evidence” is that he is working with files that a hacker already touched. People should stop posting what they don’t understand. The hack was most likely a download to a thumb drive or similar device from a local network. The time stamps for the Wikileaks files show a file transfer rate that exceeds what is possible over the internet, which means that the hack could not have been done overseas.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |